Hill 875

Peter Arnett’s view on Hill 875….

November 22nd 1967, Associated Press journalist Peter Arnett delivers a three page report on one of the worst battles the Vietnam War had seen. A fight which saw 115 US soldiers from two companies of the 173rd Airborne Brigade killed with more than 250 wounded and seven more missing in action. Forty two of those killed were at the hands of a 500lb American bomb dropped on them in one of the war’s worst ‘friendly fire’ incidents.

There are many reports on the battle for Hill 875 but for me, Arnett’s is as compelling and hard-hitting as they get. He was entrenched in Vietnam from 1962 until the war’s end in Saigon in 1975 making him a genuine authority and not one of the many ‘tourist journalists’ who made it their ‘Woodstock’.

‘Hour after hour of battle gave the living and the dead the same grey pallor on Hill 875. At times the only way to tell them apart was to watch when the enemy mortars crashed in on the exhausted American paratroopers. The living rushed unashamedly to the tiny bunkers dug into the red clay. The wounded squirmed towards the shelter of trees blasted to the ground. The dead-propped up in bunkers or face down in the dust-didn’t move.’

This was one of dozens of missions Arnett accompanied soldiers on, the result is a level-headed, bullshit-free account of the reality of warfare. It’s sobering stuff to say the least and it was the likes of Arnett who helped drive the rally against government cover ups and put the Vietnam War and all its bloody horrors square in the eyes of an American public increasingly hostile to their government’s actions.

‘The foxholes got deeper as the day wore on. Foxhole after foxhole took hits. A dog handler and his German shepherd died together. Men joking with you and offering cigarettes writhed on the ground wounded and pleading for water minutes later. There was no water for anyone’

There was in fact no food either, when the relief battalion finally arrived they had only brought enough supplies for one day and what they had they ate before they arrived at the hill. For three days the American troops faced unrelenting fire, it typified the senseless nature of war; young men being slaughtered for the right to ‘own’ a hill. How many times have Generals sent their troops to their deaths for such a cause? How many Vietnamese died for their country’s independence?

Crouched in one bunker, Pfc Angle Flores, 20, of New York City said: “If we were dead like those out there we wouldn’t have to worry about this stuff coming in” He fingered a plastic rotary around his neck and kissed it reverently as the rounds blasted on the ground outside. “Does that do you any good?” A buddy asked him ” Well, I’m still alive” Flores replied. “Don’t you know the chaplain who gave you that was killed on Sunday?” said his Buddy.’

Arnett describes how the Americans used bombs, napalm and every kind of air firepower but the truth was only manpower could truly win that battle. One hundred and fifteen young Americans died trying to capture a hill in a country most of them had never heard of before. Arnett gets that across in every sentence. It’s a three page long must-read if ever there were one.

5 replies »

  1. Peter Arnett was if nothing else, accurate. The descriptions he gave of the scenes on Hill 875 were true, In another article he described Hill 875 as the most un-nerving experience of his life. Yes it was that and more to the men who were on that Hill. I know I was sitting at the center of the “War’s most friendy fire incident” where I was wounded for the second time. This is an article that is well worth reading. Peter Arnett recorded what was until recently a little know major battle of Vietnam. Everyone has heard of Hamburger Hill, but this one was worse. More US KIA’s and WIA’s. In addition to a US Marine Corp F4 Phantom Jet dropping two 500 Lb. bombs inside the 2/503d, 173d Airborne perimeter.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bob, welcome to the site and thank you for such a compelling comment. I cannot begin to imagine what it must have been like but your comment hits home and needs to be heard. I shall search out more of his work but thank you for taking the time to comment, it is much appreciated. Kind regards to you.


  2. I was in a /2nd bat in hospital with malaria and missed 875. Guilt is hard. Got back to company 10 December and hardly knew anyone. any officer major on up that had anything to do with hill 875 should have been tried for what they did to the men on the ground. Our battalion was decimated. Our guys died so the higher ups could get metals and promotions. After 52 years I am still sick !


    • Steve, welcome to the site and thank you for such a valuable contribution. I cannot begin to imagine what it must have been like for you to come back to that. I completely agree with you, it was a travesty.


  3. You pegged it Steve. That battle should have never been fought. We could have been sent in after the B-52’s carpet bombed it down to Hill 700. Like you said, it was just so the higher up’s could claim credit on their resume and collect a few ribbon’s and medal’s for saying they were in charge of such a major battle. Well sleep well big boys, you killed plenty of young American soldiers. And especially you. The Marine LTC who hot dogged it over our defensive perimeter and dropped the bombs. Then lied about what happened. No wonder they had no grunt witnesses at a hearing on the incident. Yes, we grunts were hung out to dry. 2/503 was wasted. By our own command.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s